JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 28, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Orlando Rafael Marquez Y Otros·Respondent Juzgado Tercero Municipal De Pequeñas Causas Laborales De Barranquilla Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Aclaracion Sentencia T-748/14.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional del artículo 285 del Código General del Proceso
Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
  • Reiteración de improcedencia
  • Procedencia por presentación dentro del término de ejecutoria
Accion De Tutela En Materia De Incremento En Mesada Pensional
  • Rechazar solicitud de aclaración de sentencia T-748/14 por extemporánea
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Temas a tratar: Aclaración sentencias de tutela.

Se ordena rechazar solicitud de aclaración

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR las solicitudes de aclaración presentada por los apoderados judiciales de Julio Agudelo Trujillo y Joselin Amador Ortegón contra la Sentencia T-748 de 2014, contra los resolutivos que NEGARON el amparo solicitado.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no cabe recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.